Thursday, February 28, 2013

Why Snyder's Philosophy Is Different



            One thing I've noticed in learning about the Beat Generation is that the writers encourage or enthuse their own philosophy. Despite this, some philosophies seem easier to live by than others, and some writers may not practice what they preach. If one were to live precisely by Burroughs's ideology, it is not likely that they would get far in life professionally or socially. In any case, living with a strict philosophy may be impossible in that some things may contradict others. However, I do not believe that any of these poets were being literal enough to cause controversy within their theoretical system. I believe they were merely pressing these lifestyles onto society through their writing with the hopes of seeing some sort of positive change in society.

            The writer from the Beat Generation who I believe has a stronger philosophy, and one that he lived by for much of his life, is Gary Snyder. This week, our class discussed Snyder's work. Buddhist influences are evident in both his poems and his essays. His writings consistently involve themes of nature, and more specifically, the idea of people and nature joining without institutionalization or influence of systematic power.

            Not only did Snyder write about these ideas, and perhaps delve lightly into the culture that he preached (as other Beat writers have), but he lived for some time in Japan, where he studied Zen. He later traveled to India in a similar cultural pursuit. These travels were not for the mere sake of an impermanent good time, as they would outline his values for the rest of his life. The video gives a short perspective of some parts of Snyder's life as well as the philosophy in which he lives by.

            Many have deemed Snyder the "Thoreau of his generation," as Beat writer, Lawrence Ferlinghetti once said. I can appreciate Snyder's beliefs because they are not harmful or selfish, as many of the writers from the Beat Generation have demonstrated. While the Beat Generation as a whole represents those writers' responses to the state of their nation and its society, those responses taken individually were all considerably different. Snyder's response was hopeful, unlike some writing of Ginsberg, Burroughs, or even Kerouac (such as in "The Vanishing American Hobo").
            Snyder returned to the states and still lives life according to his Zen Buddhist beliefs. I cannot imagine living a lifestyle such as Burroughs' or Ginsberg's past my youth, but I can imagine that Snyder's values can logically be maintained throughout a person's life without being greatly compromised. I do not say this to give the impression that I plan to pursue such a philosophy for myself. I only mean to argue that it is reasonable in comparison to those of the other Beat writers thus far. I will leave with these words from Snyder, which not only support his philosophy, but can also be considered for general encouragement:
 
"We are all indigenous. We may not transform reality, but we may transform ourselves. And if we transform ourselves, we might just change the world a bit."

7 comments:

  1. I appreciate the history of Snyder's living situation. The influence of his place of living really shows through his writing. I agree with you about Snyder being one of the truest Beats. For Snyder it was not just a metaphorical search but a literal quest.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I definitely agree that Snyder seemed to actually live by his philosophy, and his writing seemed like it was researched and deliberate. I never got the impression that Snyder was simply writing down whatever came into his mind, but I felt like Kerouac was liable to forget half the things that passed from his head onto a piece of paper. As you said, Snyder's philosophy seemed stronger in the sense that it would not change according to whims. I appreciated your mention of Snyder living in Asia to learn and improve his understanding, not just because he was looking for an "impermanent" good time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is what I noticed also, his experiences aren't a day by day, in the moment kind of livelihood; he has a firm understanding of his message and how to get it across. Synder seems so different than the other writers we have studied in regard to philosophy; he definitely was not clinical.

      Delete
    2. I definitely agree that Snyder is most different from Kerouac in that his beliefs are solidified and practiced consistently. I can't decide whether Snyder is more different from Kerouac or Burroughs, as it is evident that Burroughs also stayed true to his beliefs, even in old age. However, Burroughs's beliefs are at the opposite end of the spectrum from Snyder's.

      Delete
  3. I think that Snyder's work has been the most overtly philosophical literature that we have studied so far this semester. What I appreciate about Snyder's writing is that he preaches, or supports, practical philosophical issues, like ethics or appreciation of nature. Although his work is highly theoretical, the issues he is raising can be called into question immediately and solutions can be implemented with thought and effort.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate that you pointed out the practicality of Snyder's beliefs. While his philosophy is considerably agreeable, it is also important that there is a method to it, as well as a goal. This is one more thing that separates Snyder's writing from the wandering mind of Kerouac or the callous approach that Burroughs takes.

      Delete
  4. I agree that Snyder seemed to be the most genuine in his beliefs. He lists out very specific reasons for why he believes the things he does, and he seemed to practice what he preached.

    ReplyDelete